2,756
edits
Guideline:Proprietary studies: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Principles == | == Principles == | ||
* Granularity. We would want to use granular language which helps us to communicate nuances in how reliable informations and conclusions are. | |||
* Accuracy. The study has to be granular and contain informations about the solidity of it's evidence and conclusions. It has to make a positive contributions to the accuracy of the overall picture. | * Accuracy. The study has to be granular and contain informations about the solidity of it's evidence and conclusions. It has to make a positive contributions to the accuracy of the overall picture. | ||
* Transparency. We want to avoid appearing authoritative or avoid the unrealistic appearance of 100% truth and objectivity. Instead we want to be very transparent about our process, thoughts, way of working. That is in line with our key [[Our Values#We are transparent|transparency]] value. | * Transparency. We want to avoid appearing authoritative or avoid the unrealistic appearance of 100% truth and objectivity. Instead we want to be very transparent about our process, thoughts, way of working. That is in line with our key [[Our Values#We are transparent|transparency]] value. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
* Inviting. We want to invite others to challenge our thoughts or contribute to them. | * Inviting. We want to invite others to challenge our thoughts or contribute to them. | ||
* Evolving. By being accurate, transparent, accessible and inviting our goal is to build ever evolving models that reflect reality increasingly better. This is in line with our [[Our Values#We strive for excellence|strive for excellence]] value. | * Evolving. By being accurate, transparent, accessible and inviting our goal is to build ever evolving models that reflect reality increasingly better. This is in line with our [[Our Values#We strive for excellence|strive for excellence]] value. | ||
== Language principles == | |||
* Reference back to definitions. How do we or how is someone else defining a term? Use language that makes clear that we are references back to a specific definitions instead of giving the appearance that the definition we use the the absolut truth. | |||
* Highlight confidence in conclusions. Clearly differentiate between possibilities, likely correlations and high confidence correlations. Examine your conclusions for logical stringence and cogency. Are there other logical possibilities or factors to consider? | |||
* Highlight future work. Highlight knowledge gaps and areas of further improvement. | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
* | * | ||