6,362
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 247: | Line 247: | ||
| | | | ||
|$258 million(+67%) | |$258 million(+67%) | ||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|Investment banking revenue | |||
| | |||
| -26% Y/Y | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 285: | Line 291: | ||
| | | | ||
|$234 million(+311% Y/Y) | |$234 million(+311% Y/Y) | ||
| | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|Investment banking revenue | |||
| | |||
| -24% Y/Y | |||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 373: | Line 385: | ||
Despite being large banks, they were not immune to recent banking turmoil as their deposits fell by an average of 4% year-on-year during the quarter. However, credit tightening was not observed during the period as loans grew by an average of 5%. However, the bank heads did not brush off the possibility of credit tightening in the near future. | Despite being large banks, they were not immune to recent banking turmoil as their deposits fell by an average of 4% year-on-year during the quarter. However, credit tightening was not observed during the period as loans grew by an average of 5%. However, the bank heads did not brush off the possibility of credit tightening in the near future. | ||
Investment bank performed poorly during the quarter as deals dried up. Morgan Stanley, Citi Group and Goldman Sachs saw their investment banking revenue decline by an avarage of 25% year-on-year. | |||
== References == | == References == |