Guideline:Due diligence of new sources: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
* Strength of Arguments (credibility suffers if we spot BS arguments)  
* Strength of Arguments (credibility suffers if we spot BS arguments)  
* Accuracy/objectivity of arguments (no exaggerations, no excessive "narrative" or story telling)
* Accuracy/objectivity of arguments (no exaggerations, no excessive "narrative" or story telling)
* How well do we understand the research of the author
* How well do we understand the research of the author?
Bonus point but no criteria for credibility: How easy is it to understand the work of the author overall?