2,756
edits
Guideline:Due diligence of new sources: Difference between revisions
Guideline:Due diligence of new sources (view source)
Revision as of 18:43, 26 January 2023
, 26 January 2023no edit summary
(Created page with "When occurring new sources or opinions we need to perform due diligence on them in order to determine their credibility Draft "On the topic of which opinions to consider: I...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
In the end opinions should be weighted by credibility based on the above mentioned criteria. Funds which large macro research teams like bridgewater will rank higher compared to unknown people everything else being equal. Unknown people will rank high if their research/arguments is exceptionally good. " | In the end opinions should be weighted by credibility based on the above mentioned criteria. Funds which large macro research teams like bridgewater will rank higher compared to unknown people everything else being equal. Unknown people will rank high if their research/arguments is exceptionally good. " | ||
== Criteria Summary == | |||
* Strength of track record | |||
* Sophistication of research (great primary sources used, detailed, on point) | |||
* Strength of Arguments (credibility suffers if we spot BS arguments) | |||
* Accuracy of arguments (no exaggerations, no excessive "narrative" or story telling) | |||