6,564
edits
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* However, the acquirer (Vonovia) can in future increase its stake to between 90% and 95% and initiate a squeeze-out of the remaining shareholders. Here, the shareholders, will be forced to sell their shares for adequate compensation. A shareholder who owns at least a nominal amount of €1,000 in the target could try to delay the squeeze-out resolution through legal proceedings. However, the German Stock Corporation Act provides for a fast tracking of such proceedings, allowing for a resolution within three to six months. Compensation proceedings are only handled after registration of the squeeze-out<ref name=":1" />. | * However, the acquirer (Vonovia) can in future increase its stake to between 90% and 95% and initiate a squeeze-out of the remaining shareholders. Here, the shareholders, will be forced to sell their shares for adequate compensation. A shareholder who owns at least a nominal amount of €1,000 in the target could try to delay the squeeze-out resolution through legal proceedings. However, the German Stock Corporation Act provides for a fast tracking of such proceedings, allowing for a resolution within three to six months. Compensation proceedings are only handled after registration of the squeeze-out<ref name=":1" />. | ||
* Squeeze-outs are in three forms. A takeover squeeze -out, a merger squeeze-out and a general corporate squeeze-out. A merger squeeze-out can be initiated by the acquirer (Vonovia) once it achieves 90% voting rights. However, it will have to merge with another corporation such as the target and initiate a squeeze-out within three months. A merger will likely result in a real estate tax which is around 6% of the real estate value in Berlin<ref>https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/financial-services/publications/assets/pwc-real-estate-transfer-tax.pdf</ref>. A general corporate squeeze-out requires the acquirer to have at least 95% voting rights in the target. On the other hand, a takeover squeeze-out requires the acquirer to attain at least 95% voting rights in the target and initiate a squeeze-out within three months. The The advantage of this type of squeeze-out is that if the takeover bid was accepted by at least 90% of the shareholders, the offer price offered during the takeover can be considered as adequate compensation. All the other rules mentioned above will apply in these types of squeeze-outs<ref name=":1" />. | * Squeeze-outs are in three forms. A takeover squeeze -out, a merger squeeze-out and a general corporate squeeze-out. A merger squeeze-out can be initiated by the acquirer (Vonovia) once it achieves 90% voting rights. However, it will have to merge with another corporation such as the target and initiate a squeeze-out within three months. A merger will likely result in a real estate tax which is around 6% of the real estate value in Berlin<ref>https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/financial-services/publications/assets/pwc-real-estate-transfer-tax.pdf</ref>. A general corporate squeeze-out requires the acquirer to have at least 95% voting rights in the target. On the other hand, a takeover squeeze-out requires the acquirer to attain at least 95% voting rights in the target and initiate a squeeze-out within three months. The The advantage of this type of squeeze-out is that if the takeover bid was accepted by at least 90% of the shareholders, the offer price offered during the takeover can be considered as adequate compensation. All the other rules mentioned above will apply in these types of squeeze-outs<ref name=":1" />. | ||
== Past DPLTA Real Estate Actions In Germany == | == Past DPLTA Real Estate Actions In Germany == |