2,761
edits
m (PirateCaptain moved page Article Layout to Guideline:Article Layout without leaving a redirect) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Detailed Guidelines == | |||
* [[Guideline:Article Layout/Historical Events|Historical Events]] | |||
== General Structure == | |||
'''First Draft! -''' ''Once i got enough time i will write an detailed article explaining the layout i have in mind.'' | |||
The Idea is to create an article architecture which let's us explore topics in depth indefinitely while still having precise and short summaries of our findings always one level above. | |||
Example: | |||
* Overview Level: Article "[[Investment Ideas]]" very short description of the company, our investment thesis in it, our ratings on various topics. Summarizes our findings of Company Level. | |||
* Company Level: Article "[[Upwork]]" More in depth exploration of various important ares like you've done it. Summarizes our findings of Area Level. | |||
* Area Level: Article "[[Upwork:Competition]]" In depth exploration of an specific company area. We use a : to separate the terms. | |||
* Potentially at one point another level below that E.g. "Upwork:Competition/Fiverr". We use first an : and then a / to separate the terms. | |||
I'd also like to include ratings of the topic to each level which act as our key summary of that area. | I'd also like to include ratings of the topic to each level which act as our key summary of that area. | ||
As an example Upwork:Competition could potentially get a rating like 6 which is not to bad as there are no very strong direct competitors but Linkedin as a generally very strong competitor. (Note: We need to develop clear criteria for our ratings + always justify the ratings we are giving in one area.) | As an example Upwork:Competition could potentially get a rating like 6 which is not to bad as there are no very strong direct competitors but Linkedin as a generally very strong competitor. (Note: We need to develop clear criteria for our ratings + always justify the ratings we are giving in one area.) | ||
On the question of when to break an area into an new article we eventually also need to develop guidelines (maybe if it's more than approx. 1 Din4 Page). | On the question of when to break an area into an new article we eventually also need to develop guidelines (maybe if it's more than approx. 1 Din4 Page). |